Build #62

Plan branch:

Build: #62 failed

Job: Test ManyLinux 2.28 Python 3.12 failed

Stages & jobs

  1. Test

Test results

  • 722 tests in total
  • 2 tests failed
  • 1 failure is new
  • 12 tests were quarantined / skipped
  • 2707 minutes taken in total.

Build 62 has the following 2 errors: 1 new failure(s) occurred since the previous build.

New test failures 1
Status Test Duration
Collapse Failed alma_if_fast_test test_2022_1_00207_S__uid___A001_X2d20_X373d__PPR__regression
470 mins 
Failed: Failed to match 29 result values within tolerances :
s21.hifa_gfluxscale.uid___A002_X10b6f7c_X41d1.field_0.spw_16.qa.metric.score_gfluxscale_k_spw
	values differ by > a relative difference of 1e-07
	expected: 0.9998218986723444
	new:      0.9998227851376125
	diff: -8.864652680795615e-07
	percent_diff: -8.866231768444877e-05%
s21.hifa_gfluxscale.uid___A002_X10b6f7c_X41d1.field_0.spw_18.I
(432 more lines...)
Existing test failures 1
Status Test Failing since Duration 
AssertionError: Expected key s21.hif_applycal.uid___A002_X1199f9e_X7c24.spw_31.qa.metric.phase_vs_freqslope does not match new key s21.hif_applycal.uid___A002_X1199f9e_X7c24.spw_31.qa.metric.phase_vs_freqintercept.
@pytest.mark.seven
    @pytest.mark.mpi
    def test_2023_1_00228_S__uid___A002_X1199f9e_X7c24__procedure_hifa_calimage_diffgain__regression():
        """Run ALMA cal+image regression on a 7m B2B dataset with differential gain calibration.
    
        Recipe name:                procedure_hifa_calimage_diffgain
        Dataset:                    2023.1.00228.S: uid___A002_X1199f9e_X7c24
(50 more lines...)